An inquiry into the deaths of 16 men killed in a Super Puma crash has heard that it was impossible to tell whether the 2009 tragedy could have been avoided.
Divers failed to recover missing pieces of the shattered gearbox during underwater searches of the sea bed. Experts believe the missing parts may have been destroyed during the crash or could have left the aircraft as it broke up over the water.
On Monday a fatal accident inquiry was told that it was impossible to determine whether helicopter engineers could have prevented the accident.
Air Accident Investigation Branch (AAIB) senior engineering inspector Mark Jarvis, 50, led the recovery operation in the hours following the crash on April 1, 2009. Solicitor advocate Tom Marshall, who represents the families of the victims, asked: "This accident was avoidable, is that right?"
Mr Jarvis replied: "I don't know. We don't fully understand the failure mode.
"What we do know is that if the gearbox had been removed from service and sent to the manufacturer then during their overhaul procedure this gearbox would have been rejected."
Extensive stress tests carried out on other gear models suggested it was possible the cracked gear had a material defect which had weakened it. This could have led to it breaking apart and may have resulted in catastrophic failure.
Murdo MacLeod QC, who represents Super Puma manufacturer Eurocopter, suggested a material defect would be "unlikely".
Fourteen oil workers and two pilots died when the Super Puma crashed into the sea. The inquiry continues.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article