The under-fire police force at the centre of a child abuse scandal has faced fresh criticism from inspectors over how well it deals with vulnerable children in care homes.
South Yorkshire Police had "limited understanding" of the risk posed by offenders who target vulnerable children while officers showed an inconsistent response to child sexual exploitation in Rotherham, according to Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary (HMIC).
Last month, Professor Alexis Jay, the former chief social work adviser to the Scottish Government found at least 1,400 children were abused over 16 years. Officers, she said, often treated their claims with contempt.
HMIC found officers failed to sufficiently protect three girls identified as at risk, who were sexually assaulted by several men and were reported missing from care on several occasions.
Officers were also found by inspectors to have failed to properly tackle men who are sexually exploiting young girls within the force area.
Inspector of Constabulary Dru Sharpling said: "We are concerned that force practice is inconsistent so not all children receive the standard of treatment they deserve."
She added: "We were also concerned about the lack of understanding of the risk posed by offenders who target vulnerable children, and shortcomings in the protection of children in care."
Chief Constable Ingrid Lee said steps were being taken to address the issues.
These included a central referral unit for referrals relating to children, multi-agency teams in every district, a liaison officer to engage with children in care, known sex offenders being given polygraph tests and greater sharing of information about the criminals with the public.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article