SCOTLAND'S prisons inspector has expressed concerns about overcrowding and lack of access to facilities at a prison that has taken in a new population of sex offenders.
HM Chief Inspector of Prisons, Brigadier Hugh Monro, said that although progress had been made at Glenochil Prison near Tullibody since a previous inspection in 2010, the impact on prison life of the transfer of 150 sex offenders from Peterhead in October that year had been "considerable".
He said the new population had complicated the regime at the prison as the two groups of prisoners were kept separate, meaning that their access to activities and facilities was restricted. He urged the Scottish Prison Service to address the issues before a further group of sex offenders were transferred from Peterhead.
He said: "Overcrowding has become more acute since my last visit and I was concerned to note the 'doubling up' in 90 single cells, which in my view should only occur for the minimum length of time."
Mr Monro also called for improvements to job training for staff and better prisoner access to programmes and activities.
He said: "While we have seen an increase from the previous inspection from 37% to 47% of prisoners at a daytime activity, and a new library has been set up, more still needs to be done.
"Personal officers are an essential part of mentoring and progressing prisoners, and this visit has confirmed that there are still no job descriptions for those roles. This is vital work that needs to be given focus so progress can be made.
"The arrival of sex offenders from Peterhead needs to be addressed in light of the further tranche due to transfer from Peterhead in the near future."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article