ONE of Scotland's smallest and most deprived local authorities has announced it is facing a new round of cuts, which will require savings of £7 million.
Inverclyde is to present its politicians with options to save cash worth up to £10m for 2016-17 to bridge the budget gap estimated at £7m.
The proposals will then be put out to public consultation and impact on departments delivering core frontline services.
It is the latest in a raft of announcements by councils on cuts needed for the years ahead, with several raising the very real prospect of job losses.
Glasgow City Council could need to make cuts and savings worth up to £150m in the next three years, while affluent authorities such as east Renfrewshire and East Dunbartonshire have gaps running into tens of millions.
Inverclyde last night said it would present cuts options from its education and communities departments in excess of £5m, social work of almost £3m and environment and regeneration of near £2m. Over the next three years, the local authority's budget gap is estimated to be above £15million.
Chief executive, John Mundell, said: "With a budget gap estimated to be around £7m for 2016-17, we have identified savings options that could generate £10m. We hope this will show residents some of the difficult decisions being faced and give them, businesses, trade union colleagues and our own employees a chance to express their views on priority areas for savings as part of the consultation.
"While the proposals set out have been developed by our own officers, the difficult decisions faced by councillors when setting the budget in February will be informed by the information we get back from the budget consultation process."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article