IVF pioneer Lord Winston has warned that a growing market for fertility treatments could "threaten our humanity", including if the rich were able to pay for so-called 'designer babies'.
The fertility expert, who developed key advancements in IVF treatment, told fellow academics at a conference "we have been carried away" by breakthroughs in reproduction.
He was reported as saying that enthusiasm to develop fertility techniques and desperate patients had become a "toxic mix".
During his speech at the University of Kent, Lord Winston said: "One of the problems with our work is that we have been carried away with massive enthusiasms in reproduction.
"That mixture of enthusiasm and patient desperation is actually a very toxic and heady mixture.
"It is worthwhile standing back a little from the technologies that we employ.
"One of the issues of the market is that rich people may well be able to afford, in due course, the kind of enhancement to their genetics that other poor people may not be able to afford," he added.
The newspaper said he added that a growing market for fertility treatments and pressure to enhance human qualities could mean we "end up with a society where some people may actually have something that might threaten our humanity".
However, he said that the "the age of eugenics" could die out as issues such as the shortage of resources, water, food and the threat of climate change become more important.
Phillippa Taylor of the Christian Medical Fellowship welcomed Lord Winston's words.
She told a London-based newspaper: "If Lord Winston is saying this, I hope that people take notice.
"He is someone who is an expert in the area but also someone who sees the bigger picture."
But Dr Allan Pacey, chairman of the British Fertility Society, said parents are not interested in enhancing their babies' genes.
"The law prohibits it, even if it was technically possible," he said.
"Most infertile couples are desperate for a baby, rather than a specific type of baby, and I don't see that changing."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article