Scottish star James McAvoy has revealed he first turned down the leading role in The Disappearance Of Eleanor Rigby because the subject matter felt too close to home.
The 35-year-old actor, who is father to four-year-old son Brendan, initially passed on the role of Connor Ludlow in 2010, before agreeing to star in Ned Benson's three-part film, which premiered at the BFI London Film Festival tonight.
"My son just got a great deal older so I was happier to do a film about this subject matter," he said at the film's premiere in London's Leicester Square.
"When I was asked before, he had literally just been born a couple of days before and I was like, 'I'm not touching this film', because a lot of it was about parental loss."
Written by Benson making his feature-length directorial debut, The Disappearance Of Eleanor Rigby, which stars Jessica Chastain as Connor's wife Eleanor Rigby, is split into three parts - Him, Her and Them. Each instalment explores a relationship between a young married couple living in New York from different perspectives.
McAvoy, who arrived arm-in-arm with wife Anne-Marie Duff, admitted: "It was very easy to get into character. The character isn't a million miles away from who I am and the thing that defines him in this movie, I can relate to quite easily. So it wasn't hard to get into character, it was just hard to stay in character. It stays with you."
Benson said the X-Men star was his top choice from the start.
"James was my first choice to play this role," the 37-year-old filmmaker said.
"When I went to him at first, he'd just had his son so the subject matter was a little uncomfortable for him, but then I had scheduling issues with another actor and I went back to him. When he said yes, that was like a dream come true for me."
He added: "I was pretty lucky. It's an amazing troupe of actors I got to work with."
The film is due to be released in UK cinemas early next year.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article