JK Rowling's new detective novel has been caught up in a row between her publisher and online retailer Amazon over the price of e-books.
Hachette Book Group, her New York-based publishers, has apologised to its authors for the pricing dispute with Amazon that prompted the online retailer to block pre-orders for some of the publisher's forthcoming book releases.
The disagreement has led to the removal of pre-order buttons for a number of titles on Amazon.com including her The Silkworm novel written under Ms Rowling's pen name Robert Gilbraith.
"Please know that we are doing everything in our power to find a solution to this difficult situation, one that best serves our authors and their work, and that preserves our ability to survive and thrive as a strong and author-centric publishing company," said Hachette chief executive Michael Pietsch said in a letter to authors.
Numerous Hachette authors have criticized Amazon in recent weeks, including James Patterson, who on his Facebook page noted that the purchase of books written by him, Malcolm Gladwell, Nicholas Sparks and others had been made more difficult.
"What I don't understand about this particular battle tactic is how it is in the best interest of Amazon customers," Patterson wrote.
A ruling by US District Judge Denise Cote, in July last year, found Apple played a "central role" in scheming from late 2009 into early 2010 with five publishers including Hachette to raise e-book prices and impede competitors such as Amazon.com.
Executives from the companies would meet in the private dining rooms of New York restaurants to bemoan the low prices charged by Amazon, and what they could do about it, Judge Cote said in her ruling.
The US Department of Justice said the conspiracy was created to challenge Amazon's dominance in the e-book market. The publishers and Apple sought to raise e-book prices above the $9.99 price tag favoured by Amazon.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article