Former defence secretary John Reid has warned that UK warships will not be built in Scotland if it votes for independence in next year's referendum.
His comments come after defence giant BAE Systems announced that 1,775 jobs will go across the UK.
Shipbuilding will end at Portsmouth in the second half of next year and hundreds of jobs will be lost in Scotland at the Govan and Scotstoun yards in Glasgow as well as at Rosyth in Fife.
But work on the new Type 26 vessels is earmarked for the Glasgow yards, giving workers there a vital lifeline.
UK Government ministers have already hinted that this work could go elsewhere if people in Scotland vote Yes to independence next September, though Scotland's Deputy First Minister Nicola Sturgeon has insisted Clyde shipyards could still build the ships.
Lord Reid said that UK warships would not be built north of the border if Scotland left the UK and became a foreign country.
He said: "The wider lesson from the last few days is that the only way to secure the future of Scotland's shipyards is to remain in the UK. This is not a matter of political opinion, it is a matter of fact.
"It is a fact that since the Second World War no UK Government of any political stripe has ever commissioned the building of a warship in a foreign country. It is a fact that for security, as well as economic and political, reasons we build these ships here at home in the UK."
He added: "In short, we don't build warships abroad now - and what's left of the UK wouldn't do so if Scotland separated."
BAE said there will be 835 redundancies in Glasgow, Rosyth and Filton, near Bristol, and the remaining 940 in Portsmouth.
More detail about the job losses is expected to emerge from talks between the company and unions early this week.
The war of words between Ms Sturgeon and Scottish Secretary Alistair Carmichael escalated today as he called on her to admit she is wrong on her assertion that an independent Scotland could still build UK warships.
He said: "Nicola Sturgeon is looking pretty isolated on this. The best thing she could do is admit that she is wrong.
"Is she really saying that everyone else is wrong and she is right? Is she telling us that the people who build the warships and the people who place the contracts know less about this than she does?"
He added: "The future of the Clyde yards is sustainable as part of a large and successful United Kingdom. Brilliant workers and the best complex warships in the world, it is a great combination and we should not break it."
Ms Sturgeon rebuffed suggestions that Scottish yards would not get the work if the country leaves the UK.
She said: "The simple fact is that the decision to close Portsmouth will leave the Clyde as the only place on these shores with the capacity to build naval surface ships - and that decision is testament to the world-class skills of the workers at the Clyde yards."
She added: "Our support for the Clyde is unconditional, whatever the people decide next year - as the shop steward of the Govan yard has demanded it should be - but the support of Mr Carmichael and his colleagues seems conditional on Scots doing what Westminster wants.
"The Scottish Secretary needs to tell people - does he support this work staying on the Clyde whatever the result of next year's referendum or is he actively engaged in undermining the future of one of our great industries?"
Ms Sturgeon and Finance Secretary John Swinney met BAE Systems directors and union officials in Glasgow on Friday and discussed what the Scottish Government can do to help those losing their jobs.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article