RELATIVES of King Richard III, whose body was unearthed in a council car park last year, have won the right to bring High Court proceedings to challenge a plan to rebury his remains in Leicester.
Many of his relatives want the body buried in York, claiming it would have been the King's wish.
A High Court judge in London has given permission to the Plantagenet Alliance to bring judicial review proceedings against the Justice Secretary and the University of Leicester.
Richard was killed at the battle of Bosworth in 1485 --ending the Wars of the Roses and the Plantagenet dynasty - and was hurriedly buried in the church of the Greyfriars in Leicester, which was subsequently lost during redevelopment.
His remains were discovered buried under a municipal car park owned by Leicester City Council after a search instigated by Edinburgh-based screenwriter and secretary of the Richard III Society Philippa Langley.
Mr Justice Haddon-Cave, in granting permission for a hearing later in the year, said the discovery was "without precedent".
He said: "I would, however, urge the parties to avoid embarking on the (legal) Wars of the Roses Part 2.
"In my view, it would be unseemly, undignified and unedifying to have a legal tussle over these royal remains.
"This would not be appropriate, or in the country's interests."
Mr Justice Haddon-Cave, sitting in London, said the discovery was the result of "inspired, determined and meticulous work" by Richard III Society members, the University of Leicester Archaeological Services, and Leicester City Council.
Archaeologists from the University of Leicester were granted permission to excavate the car park and to decide where the bones should be reburied by the Ministry of Justice. Under the terms of a licence to dig up the remains, the university has decided that Richard should be re-interred at Leicester Cathedral.
But opponents argue he would have wanted to be put to rest at York Minster.
Mr Justice Haddon-Cave said: "I would strongly recommend that parties immediately consider referring the fundamental question - as to where and how Richard III is reburied - to an independent advisory panel made up of suitable experts and Privy Councillors."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article