A UNION has warned of a "tightening of the knot" in the Grangemouth oil refinery dispute, with plant owner Ineos expected to announce today how it will respond to the rejection of new terms and conditions by half its workforce.
The Unite union said it was given 665 forms by last night's 6pm deadline rejecting the offer of a pay freeze and changes to pension conditions from the 1350-strong workforce.
Ineos, which had threatened to close the plant for good unless workers agreed to a survival plan, would only say a shareholders' meeting planned for today would discuss the matter.
But while Unite hailed the rejection by 65% of its Grangemouth membership of the company's demands to sign up to the proposals, there are fears over the next move by Ineos and its chairman and founder Jim Ratcliffe.
The rejection has sparked renewed calls for political intervention by both the Scottish Government and the Coalition Government, with sources claiming the deadlock could be broken by stakeholders such as PetroChina or BP. PetroChina owns a substantial percentage of Scotland's biggest oil refinery.
A senior union source said: "There's a nervousness about what happens now. Ratcliffe won't mess about. He calls the shots, not shareholders. The knot's tightening but is he going to sack 50% of the workforce with a view to more?
"The result shows this isn't a handful of mavericks opposing these terms. What this needs is huge political intervention over what is a corporate shutdown, not a strike."
The refinery, which has an annual capacity of 10 million tonnes, provides most of the fuel in Scotland, Northern England and Northern Ireland.
Ineos has warned the plant, which remains shut down despite the planned strike by Unite members being called off, is losing £10 million-a-month and would close in 2017 without new investment and changes to workers' terms and conditions. It has offered those who supported the survival plan a transitional payment of up to £15,000.
But Unite has accused the company of giving workers an ultimatum of accepting worse pay and conditions or losing their jobs.
The two sides have been embroiled in a bitter dispute for weeks, initially over the treatment of Unite convener Stephen Deans, who was involved in the row over a selection of a Labour candidate in Falkirk, where he chairs the constituency party.
He was suspended, then reinstated, and is facing an internal investigation, which is due to report on Friday, with speculation he could be a casualty of Unite's rejection of the terms.
Mr Ratcliffe said at the weekend that the fate of the plant rested with its staff.
He said: "This is not a bluff. The clock is ticking. Grangemouth could have a future but that is absolutely in the hands of the workers. If we go down the wrong road, then I'm afraid this story will not have a happy ending."
Urging the company to return to talks at the conciliation service Acas, Pat Rafferty, Unite's Scottish secretary said: "This resounding rejection of the company's cynical blackmail sends a clear message to the company.
"The people of Grangemouth and Scotland will be expecting Jim Ratcliffe and the Ineos shareholders to now take heed. Do the right thing tomorrow, drop the threats to the workforce, fire up the plant and get around the table at Acas.
"This workforce has said that they want to secure a future for Grange-mouth, free from fear, based on negotiation not confrontation.
"With Ineos making £2 billion in profits last year, people don't think that their claims of financial distress stack up."
Meanwhile, Mr Deans laughed off suggestions that he had signed up to the company deal and accused Ineos of exaggerating the numbers of those who had. He had been the subject of rumours that he may have broken ranks to accept the compulsory terms.
He said: "That is absolutely, horrendously wrong. I can't describe how ridiculous that is without using foul and abusive language. But what is true is that we have been flooded with forms at the Unite office."
A spokesman for Prime Minister David Cameron said: "There is a responsibility on all sides and that's why it is important that they continue to try to find an agreement that ensures a sustainable future for the facility."
First Minister Alex Salmond repeated earlier calls he made during the SNP conference in Perth for Ineos to "fire up the plant" and for Unite to commit to a "no strike, without strings, guarantee".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article