THE Labour politician at the centre of allegations he threatened the career of a former colleague's disabled son during a crunch budget debate this week was previously investigated for inappropriate behaviour towards another female councillor.
Gilbert Davidson has been accused of using his role as a board member of the council-owned firm employing former Labour councillor Anne Marie Millar's son to strong-arm her into voting with former colleagues in what became a battle for the party's survival in Glasgow.
Mrs Millar, whose son Stephen has previously been an Apprentice of the Year and touted as Employee of the Year at City Building, said she believed the move was a clear attempt at threatening and intimidating her. The claims sparked pledges of an investigation by Labour.
It has led to calls for Scottish Labour leader Johann Lamont to condemn the "bullying and intimidation employed by the Labour group on Glasgow City Council" and to "take disciplinary action against those responsible".
However, it is not the first time Mr Davidson has been in the headlines for the wrong reasons.
Two years ago, The Herald revealed he had been arrested at his home after allegedly sending suggestive voice mails and text messages to former Glasgow Lord Provost Liz Cameron and asking her to share a hotel room with him during a local by-election.
The charges against the Springburn councillor, who was suspended by Labour during the investigation, were later dropped due to insufficient evidence.
Mr Davidson also faced allegations he groped ex-colleague Ruth Black, whose exit from Labour was confirmed yesterday, in the City Chambers in 2008.
In one of the more bizarre decisions at the council in recent years, Mr Davidson, whose reselection surprised many in the party, also chaired the committee that banned an advert for Reebok running shoes in the city because it featured the word "bum".
The committee that day also included Mrs Millar and fellow Labour councillors Tommy Morrison and Willie O'Rourke, all three of whom sided with the opposition in Thursday's vote.
The Herald understands many in the Labour group are furious Mr Davidson is embroiled in renewed controversy. One said: "He wouldn't have meant anything. People know what Gilbert's like. But he shouldn't have said anything to Anne Marie and certainly not mention anything about her family."
Another said: "It's pretty widely accepted Gilbert's got quite a chequered past and isn't the political world's biggest thinker. He's a pretty decent local councillor but speaks his mind too often and doesn't follow political niceties."
Despite the decision by several former Labour members to vote with the opposition, Labour had its budget passed by just two votes in the biggest threat to its authority in over 30 years.
But the SNP has seized on the bullying allegations and exits from Labour. In a notable move, local government minister Derek Mackay has made the unusual move of criticising a council his role requires him to work with.
He said: "In my role ministerial role I enjoy working with councils of varying political colours that are elected by people from all over Scotland but the scenes from yesterday inside the proud old building at George Square were embarrassing, and deeply damaging. Labour's position in Glasgow is now completely untenable."
In his letter to Ms Lamont, SNP MSP James Dornan said: "No-one who saw Councillor Millar yesterday could have been in any doubt she had been on the receiving end of some very unpleasant behaviour. She was visibly shaken and upset. Glasgow Labour was under pressure, but that is no excuse for this disgraceful behaviour. It is no way to run a council or a city."
A Labour spokesman said the party would look seriously at any claims of bullying.
The Herald called Mr Davidson but he hung up.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article