Investment in green energy projects is being held back by the lack of clarity over the status of Scotland's wild land - glens, moors and mountains - in the planning process.
That is the veiw of rural property consultants representing landowners trying to develop renewable energy projects such as wind farms.
Alison Campbell of Bidwells was responding to Audit Scotland's recent report which raised questions about the feasibility of the Scottish Government's targets for green energy and its jobs predictions.
It found ministers' policy was undermined by the current economic climate, changes in UK energy policy, private-sector reluctance to invest and EU regulations.
Ms Campbell, who handles land deals for wind farm and hydro-electricity schemes, was more optimistic.
She said with a stronger economy and more clarity over electricity market reform, a mini-investment boom is possible.
But, she said, there were two barriers to this: access to grid connection and the planning process itself.
"There is a need for clarity around the planning status for wild land ... The lack of clarity is a disincentive to investors, and the Scottish Government needs to press on with its consultation on the matter and ensure the lines are clearly drawn."
Wild land charity the John Muir Trust (JMT) unsuccessfully petitioned the Scottish Parliament earlier this year for a specific wild land designation to be created.
Helen McDade, the JMT's head of policy, said : "The problem is not the planning process, but developers submitting planning applications when SNH has made it clear they are unacceptable."
A Scottish Government spokesman said: "We are committed to protecting wild land in Scotland."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article