• Text size      
  • Send this article to a friend
  • Print this article

Lawyers failing to tell clients how to complain

ALMOST 20% of solicitors fail to tell dissatisfied clients they can take their concerns to the Scottish Legal Complaints Commission, five years after it was set up.

The Commission, which replaced the Legal Ombudsman in 2008, has so far awarded more than £250,000 in compensation or rebated fees for inadequate professional services, according to its annual report.

It received 1123 complaints in 2012/13 and says poor communi­cation by lawyers is at the root of a "staggering" 57% of all cases - only 4% are about fees.

It also says complaints overall are down 8% since 2008, but they are increasing in the most complained-of areas, led by residential conveyancing, which accounts for 19% of the total, followed by litigation (16%) and family law (15%).

The Commission added: "Almost a fifth of practitioners did not refer dissatisfied clients to the SLCC and we are continually finding examples where practitioners have not signposted clients to us.

"We are working with consumer bodies such as Which?, Citizens Advice Scotland and the Office Of Fair Trading to ensure infor­mation about the SLCC is both up to date and more widely accessible."

Complaints about professional misconduct are still referred to the Law Society Of Scotland and Faculty Of Advocates.

The number of complaints submitted to the Commission this year was down from 1264 the previous year. Almost half of the complaints dealt with were upheld last year, against one in three upheld by the English legal ombudsman.

The Commission says that is down to better complaint screening, and the successful use of mediation. It says the handling cost per complaint is down 37%, and about 50% of grievances are now resolved between practitioner and client.

Chief executive Matthew Vickers said: "We encourage parties to mediate, and we run a free in-house mediation service. Typically, if you can get both sides involved in mediation the success rate is about 75%."

He said people were sometimes put off because they thought they "had to be in the same room" in mediation with the lawyer they were complaining about, which was not the case.

Mr Vickers said the Commission was in discussions with the Law Society Of Scotland, consumer groups and academics over reforming the system whereby any appeal against a Commission decision had to go through expensive litigation in the Court Of Session.

He said the commission was about to review the operation of the Law Society's Guarantee Fund, intended to protect the public against fraud by solicitors.

The SLCC was also concerned about the difficulty of securing redress for clients when a law firm went bust and a judicial factor or trustees were involved.

"The complainer is just a creditor the same as anyone else," he said. "There is no point in having a complaints system where, at the end of it, people can't get redress. You are putting people through a wringer not to get the redress they deserve."

Commission chairman Bill Brackenridge said: "I would encourage the profession to continue to work closely with the SLCC to promote best practice, further reduce the number of complaints and continue to improve the reputation of the legal sector".

Contextual targeting label: 

Commenting & Moderation

We moderate all comments on HeraldScotland on either a pre-moderated or post-moderated basis.
If you're a relatively new user then your comments will be reviewed before publication and if we know you well and trust you then your comments will be subject to moderation only if other users or the moderators believe you've broken the rules

Moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours. Please be patient if your posts are not approved instantly.