The "limbs-in-the-loch" killer William Beggs has been awarded compensation for the length of time taken for his appeals to be heard.
Beggs was convicted in 2001 of murdering 18-year-old Barry Wallace in Kilmarnock, Ayrshire.
The victim's limbs and torso were recovered from Loch Lomond while his head was found washed up on a beach near Troon.
Beggs was jailed for life and ordered to spend at least 20 years behind bars.
The European Court of Human Rights yesterday published a ruling that awarded Beggs €6000 (£4800) after finding his human rights had been breached under article 6.1 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Article 6.1 states: "In the determination ... of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law."
The award is made up of 2000 euros for non- pecuniary damage (damages for which there is no formal monetary scale, such as pain and suffering) and €4000 for legal costs and expenses.
Beggs has failed in previous appeals to overturn his conviction at the Supreme Court and the Appeal Court in Edinburgh. His entire appeal proceedings have lasted more than 10 years and three months.
A summary of the European Court ruling stated: "Although the case was complex, this did not in itself justify appeal proceedings which lasted over 10 years. A substantial proportion of the delay had been caused by the applicant's own conduct.
"However, there were also periods of inactivity where the courts had failed to take steps to progress matters of their own motion, and this led the Court to find a violation of the right to trial within a reasonable time.
"As regards Mr Beggs' numerous challenges to the fairness of the trial pro-ceedings, the Court found his trial was fair and declared all of his complaints inadmissible."
Beggs first made an application to the European Court of Human Rights in June 2006. He was seeking £16,400 in respect of non-pecuniary damage and more than £10,000 for legal expenses.
He was jailed for life after being found guilty of murder in October 2001.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article