THE Crown Office owes the country an explanation for its handling of the Lockerbie bombing, former MP Tam Dalyell has claimed.
Mr Dalyell, who believes that Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al Megrahi is innocent of the atrocity, said the Crown had "misbehaved" during the prosecution and that the trial judges "seemingly were deceived".
The veteran politician and former Father of the House of Commons has been a prominent figure in attempts to uncover the truth about the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 in which 270 people were killed.
Mr Dalyell, taking part in the Glasgow's Aye Write! literary festival, said during several of his 16 adjournment debates in the House of Commons, he raised the questions contained in a report by the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission (SCCRC) and revealed in The Herald last week.
He said: "The Crown Office have been really culpable in my opinion in that they misbehaved, and misbehaved in relation to the judges.
"I realise that the judges find it difficult to go back on previous cases but in these exceptional circumstances, I really wonder what Lord Coulsfield [one of the trial judges], is thinking because the judges seemingly were deceived."
Mr Dalyell, who has previously said that he was "mystified" at how the judges could have arrived at a verdict other than not guilty or not proven, added: "I am quite prepared to concede that the judges didn't know all the evidence at the time, but the Crown Office did. And the Crown office really do owe the rest of the country an explanation."
He said that after John Major left Downing Street, the former Prime Minister told him he had spent an hour after an adjournment debate questioning officials on whether "Tam Dalyell could be right" in his concerns about the Lockerbie trial.
At the Aye Write! festival Mr Dalyell was asked about Holyrood's handling of the return to Libya of Megrahi and he said he believed the dying, convicted bomber was released because the Scottish Government "knew he was innocent".
Mr Dalyell's latest book, The Importance of Being Awkward, an autobiography, includes details of his hard-fought Lockerbie campaign.
Meanwhile, it has been reported that the former FBI officer who oversaw the Lockerbie investigation has claimed that the SCCRC did not consult anyone from the Bureau when it was compiling its report.
Oliver "Buck" Revell, in an email to Scottish Government and legal officials, claimed the SCCRC had not interviewed members of the FBI for its Statement of Reasons on Megrahi's grounds for appeal against conviction.
Mr Revell said: "I don't know what the SCCRC expects to determine when it is not even interviewing the actual investigators involved in solving this terrible crime."
Richard Marquise, an FBI agent who led the investigation on the ground, said: "They never did speak to the people who might be able to shed some light on whatever it is they were looking to find out. "If you are going to say you have done a complete investigation, you should talk to everybody who was key and I like to think people in the FBI were key."
Meanwhile, Libya has called for the extradition of intelligence chief Abdullah al Senussi following his arrest in Mauritania. Senussi, who was one of the most prominent figures from the Gaddafi regime and is wanted by the International Criminal Court, was arrested at Nouakchott airport after arriving on a flight from Casablanca.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article