A SCOTS council has been ranked the fourth poorest local authority in the UK for food safety enforcement, according to a new study.
Which? placed West Dunbartonshire behind two London local authorities and one in Kent as it claimed some are struggling to ensure businesses comply with food safety rules.
It ranked them on three criteria: the proportion of high or medium-risk premises that were "broadly compliant" with food hygiene requirements, the percentage of premises that had received a risk rating, and the proportion of inspections and other follow-ups required that were actually carried out.
The study found that of the 749 establishments in West Dunbartonshire, 98.7% had been rated for risk and less than half [45.6%] were broadly compliant. It carried out inspections and follow ups in 99.4% of cases.
The survey also rated Orkney as the best area in Scotland for food safety enforcement.
Across the UK, Which? found a third of high and medium-risk food businesses were not abiding by hygiene rules, while work to check standards such as the accuracy of food labels was described as "patchy". The organisation said the report placed fresh doubts on the food industry following last year's horsemeat scandal.
Bexley in south-east London is the poorest-performing local authority, with five other London councils in the bottom 10, according to the research, which took into account premises such as hospitals, care homes, restaurants, takeaways, retailers and food suppliers.
Cherwell District Council in north Oxfordshire came top out of 395 local authorities in the UK.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article