FORMER Solicitor General and High Court judge Lord McCluskey renewed his attack on police as he fights to keep corroboration.
The 84-year-old earlier this year declared "policemen are not saints" and cited examples of miscarriages of justice and other law enforcement failings, such as the Jimmy Savile scandals in England, where the old Scots Law safeguard does not apply.
The life peer has made an even more detailed assault on law enforcement, Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill and the Crown. In a letter to the Scottish Parliament's Justice Committee, Lord McCluskey said ministerial "failure" to understand the law reflected "what appears to be the practical everyday failure of the police to understand the law or apply it properly in practice".
He added: "Thus the Justice Secretary repeated on many occasions the nonsensical view (presumably obtained from the police) that the law of corroboration required that two policemen had to go to London to collect a CD Rom.
"Against that background of police misunderstanding, it is hardly surprising that assaulted women are misinformed by the police - as to the alleged reason why their cases are not going to be taken to court (viz 'No corroboration') and are thus led to support the false notion that abolishing the rule requiring corroboration is going to increase the prospects of justice for women.
"Because the diagnosis of the causes of the problem is mistaken, the wrong remedy (abolition of corroboration) has been chosen and the real causes are neglected. One has only to look at England to see that the problem of poor conviction rates in sexual assault cases there is as bad as, or even worse than, it is in Scotland."
A criminal justice bill including the abolition of corroboration has already been passed at stage 1 and will now be considered by the Justice Committee.
Senior officers have made no secret that they support the move and insist that it would not change how they go about their investigations.Lord McCluskey rejects this.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article