FLAMBOYANT racing pundit John McCririck could only have been sacked by Channel 4 if he was employed by them in the first place, a tribunal heard.
The 73-year-old was axed last October after a gradual drop in the time he appeared in Channel 4's racing coverage. Claiming age discrimination, he is now suing the broadcaster and IMG Sports Media for of £3 million. Both companies deny his claim.
The broadcaster says the betting expert who became one of its best-known faces was never its employee and he had been commissioned to work for them by Highflyer, who produced the channel's racing coverage before IMG took over.
McCririck, of Primrose Hill, north London, said in a statement that in 1983 he signed a deal with Highflyer, which was to produce racing programmes for Channel 4.
"The racing on Channel 4 became an immediate success and became a flagship programme on a Saturday afternoon," he says. "Due to my perceived extravagant personality, I became one of the main faces of the programme and indeed of Channel 4. Again, as part of my contract, I was unable to send in a replacement. I would have to organise my personal life and other activities around Channel 4."
When the contract to produce Channel 4 Racing was awarded to IMG last August, the presenter assumed his contract would simply transfer over.
In January 2008 he was told the number of days he would work would be considerably cut, and was "furious".
He said: "I had considered Channel 4 to be main employment and was extremely unhappy that my hours and pay would be reduced."
Channel 4 agreed to make him an ex-gratia payment of £20,000, he says.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article