Mel B's husband Stephen Belafonte has said he feels he has been the victim of a "witch-hunt" amid reports the pair had split.
The 39-year-old X Factor judge was reported to have walked out on the film producer following a series of arguments which took place before she was rushed to hospital at the end of last week.
A mystery illness caused her to miss filming for one night of the hit show's final, before returning on Sunday - and sparking further rumours by apparently not wearing her wedding ring.
But Mr Belafonte, who on Twitter publicly denied hitting his wife, told The Sun she might no have worn the ring because "maybe her hands were swollen".
The pair, who secretly wed in Las Vegas in 2007 after a whirlwind romance, had not spoken since the former Scary Spice Spice Girl was admitted to hospital, according to the Sun, but Mr Belafonte said they had now spoken by phone.
And he told the newspaper: "You know what, it's not even about Mel and it's not even about me. There were some motives going on from other people on certain things.
"I find it really sad nobody would like for Mel, or us, to be happy. There had to be an attitude of, 'Oh they got into a fight so now let's go for the jugular'.
"And by the way, Mel's never said anything. This is because there's a witch-hunt and a feeding frenzy against me."
The mother of three offered some insight into the couple's private life this week in an interview with Grazia magazine, having turned up late for a photo shoot "not in the best of moods".
"I walked in p****d off because I had a big row with my husband about stupid stuff," she told the magazine's Christmas issue. "Sometimes he p****s me off like no other, but," she added, "he gets me."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article