HOLYROOD ministers are prepared to go it alone in the UK as they seek to protect workers from controversial zero-hours contracts from any companies seeking public sector work.
Public procurement rules may be tightened to exclude firms involved in the practice from bidding for contracts with government agencies, councils and the NHS.
The Scottish Government yesterday said it was looking at options available to tackle the issue through public tendering. It cannot change employment policy, which is reserved to Westminster.
A survey yesterday estimated up to one million UK workers may be subject to the deals. They leave staff tied to a company but with no guarantee of their working hours when they report for work. Wider employment rights are also nullified.
Amazon, which has a depot in Dunfermline, Fife, has been criticised for freeing workers half-way through shifts when public transport is no longer running. Buckingham Palace, shops and private firms with public sector contracts have also used them.
A Scottish Government spokesman said it was "actively considering whether issues around the use of zero-hour contracts can form a legitimate consideration for a public body as part of the public procurement process."
He added: "The Scottish Government and its agencies do not employ people on zero-hours contracts."
A poll by the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development has estimated the number of UK workers on such contracts as in excess of a million.
Labour's Finance spokesman Iain Gray said: "This survey raises the urgent question of how prevalent zero-hour contracts are in Scotland.
"If Scotland is in proportion to the rest of the UK, 100,000 Scots must be stuck on these contracts with no guarantee they will get work despite making themselves available to their employer."
Business Secretary Vince Cable is under pressure from Labour to hold a formal consultation to find out the extent of the contracts. He has so far only ordered a review.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article