Supermarket own brands have trumped Harrods and Fortnum and Mason in a blind taste test of Christmas puddings and Champagne.
The panel for the annual Which? Christmas test awarded the title of best pudding to Morrisons for its £3.99 M Signature Jewelled Fruit offering, giving it a score of 85% and describing it as "simply majestic" with a "great depth of flavour" in a field that also included the Harrods £12.50 Luxury variety.
But the panel, which included Great British Bake Off 2013 winner Frances Quinn and food critic Charles Campion, was less complimentary about upmarket retailer Fortnum and Mason's £10 St James pudding, describing it as having an "artificial flavour" and comparing the taste to a citrus bathroom cleaner.
Which? asked supermarkets and retailers to nominate a premium pudding for tasting.
The panel blind-tasted each pudding, giving a mark out of 10 for appearance, aroma, taste and texture.
The final scores were converted to a percentage and ranked in order.
Asda's £5 Extra Special Mulled Port and Orange pudding achieved the lowest score of 48% and was criticised for its "unpleasant, chemical" flavour.
Sainsbury's Blanc de Blanc Brut Champagne at £22.50 was jointly awarded the title of best Champagne alongside Piper-Heidsieck Brut (£33), both with a score of 80%.
The two bottles beat offerings from Veuve Clicquot, Moet and Chandon and Laurent-Perrier.
The best-scoring sparkling wine was The Co-operative's £9.99 Prosecco, scoring 78% for its "good level of acidity and a good balance of bitterness and fruitiness".
Which? editor Richard Headland said: "Christmas can be an expensive time of the year so it's satisfying to see our festive taste tests revealed that some of the cheapest were also some of the best.
"Time and again, we find supermarket own labels giving the big brands and high-end retailers a real run for their money."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article