A MOTHER is taking legal action against a private crematorium after her baby's ashes were "thrown away".
Lee-Anne Gerry, 27, was 10 days overdue with her first child when she was told baby Ellie had died in her womb.
She had to give birth to her 6lb 12oz stillborn baby who died after the umbilical cord got wrapped around her neck.
Accountancy student Ms Gerry cradled Ellie in her arms for four hours before nurses took her away.
She arranged for a private funeral service at Craigton Crematorium in Glasgow, run by the Co-operative, for her daughter but she claimed she was told by staff there would be no ashes.
Ms Gerry said she was later told there had been ashes and that staff had thrown them on the grass in their gardens of remembrance after the funeral without her knowledge. She said she had been robbed of the chance to grieve for her daughter and has now joined hundreds of other mothers to take legal action against crematoriums.
Ms Gerry, from Govan, said: "I asked about getting a special small urn made for her ashes but was told there wouldn't be anything left. I was gutted and upset but accepted their word."
She has since received an e-mail from Craigton telling her "the ashes were dispersed in the garden of remembrance as per the instructions of the applicant".
Ms Gerry, who is being represented by Thompsons Solicitors, insisted she had no idea she was signing a form to let a stranger throw away her daughter's ashes.
She said: "That's not what I would have wanted for my daughter."
The crematorium said it was carrying out the wishes of the family.
The Co-operative Funeralcare said: "We would like to reassure the family that the funeral was carried out in accordance with the wishes of the family member who arranged the funeral.
"However, as legal proceedings are ongoing, it would be inappropriate to comment further."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article