MOUNTAINEERS have insisted that a new wind farm planned close to one of Scotland's national parks would ruin views for visitors and residents.
The Mountaineering Council of Scotland said it was maintaining its opposition to the Nathro Hill wind farm proposed near Brechin, Angus, despite the Ministry of Defence and RSPB Scotland withdrawing their objections following assurances.
A total of 17 turbines would be erected under plans submitted by Edinburgh-based company Eurowind.
The Mountaineering Council says the proposed 143-metre (469ft) turbines would have a significant adverse visual impact on the landscape setting of the Cairngorms National Park and the Deeside Area Of Landscape Significance.
David Gibson, the council's chief officer, said: "Turbines of the size proposed, with a string-like layout following a high ridge, would significantly detrimentally impact upon the sense of space that is intrinsic to residents', mountaineers' and other visitors' experience of the eastern Grampian plateaux and summits."
He said the sense of space enjoyed from Munros (mountains over 3000ft) such as Lochnagar, Dreish and Mount Keen, and the closer Corbett (between 2500ft and 3000ft) of Ben Tirran would be diminished by the "vertical punctuation" of the turbines.
Ian Lindsay, director of Eurowind, said: "The wind farm will have minimal impact on iconic hill walking areas in the Angus glens and beyond. We are keen to meet the MCoS to address its concerns."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article