Rupert Murdoch has been asked to explain to MPs his comments about the "totally incompetent" police investigation into allegations of phone hacking and corrupt payments.
The News Corp boss was apparently recorded describing the treatment of journalists who had been arrested as a disgrace and saying police had been told to obtain court orders to get information, rather than the company offering up material as it had done previously.
Home Affairs Select Committee chairman Keith Vaz has written to Mr Murdoch asking him to comment on the secret recording.
The request follows evidence to the committee from the Metropolitan Police's assistant commissioner Cressida Dick, who said that since May voluntary co-operation had been significantly reduced.
She also said Scotland Yard was trying to obtain a copy of the recording of Mr Murdoch.
On the secret tape, Mr Murdoch is heard railing at the way the police behaved. "Still, I mean, it's a disgrace. Here we are, two years later, and the cops are totally incompetent," he said.
"The idea that the cops then started coming after you, kick you out of bed, and your families, at six in the morning, is unbelievable.
"But why are the police behaving in this way? It's the biggest inquiry ever, over next to nothing."
When a journalist asked why so much material had been handed over, Mr Murdoch indicated he believed it had gone too far.
"Because – it was a mistake, I think," he said. "But, in that atmosphere, at that time, we said, 'Look, we are an open book, we will show you everything'. And the lawyers just got rich going through millions of emails."
Mr Murdoch is also expected to be recalled by the Culture, Media and Sport select committee in the autumn to answer questions about the tape.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article