A type of MRSA found in humans originated in cattle at least 40 years ago, new research has found.
Scientists in Edinburgh say they have found evidence livestock were the original source of an MRSA strain now widespread in humans.
Researchers studied the genetic make-up of more than 40 strains of a bacterium called Staphylococcus aureus that can build up antibiotic resistance to develop into MRSA.
At least two genetic "subtypes" of the bacterium, which have become endemic in humans, have been traced back to cattle by a team at the Roslin Institute at Edinburgh University.
They say the most likely scenario is the bug crossed from cattle to people through direct contact - perhaps by working with farm animals.
After switching to human hosts, the Staphylococcus aureus bacterium became resistant to methicillin antibiotics and developed into methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, or MRSA.
It is hoped the research will help scientists prevent further strains from jumping from livestock.
Lead researcher, Professor Ross Fitzgerald, said: "Human infections caused by bacteria being transmitted directly from livestock are well known to occur.
"However this is the first clear genetic evidence of subtypes of Staphylococcus aureus which jumped from cattle and developed the capacity to transmit widely among human populations."
The study is published in the journal mBio and also involved Cambridge University, National Food Institute Denmark, Public Health England and the Statens Serum Institute, Denmark.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article