A DOZEN MSPs have thrown their support behind a campaign to bring the cruise ship QE2 back to the Clyde.
Clydebank MSP Gil Paterson tabled a Parliamentary motion calling the ship an "icon of Scottish shipbuilding" and pledging support to the group behind the drive.
By noon yesterday, Mr Paterson's motion had been backed by 11 fellow MSPs and praised by the man leading calls to permanently moor the QE2 on Clydebank, where she was built at John Brown's yard more than 40 years ago.
Charlie Sherry, 47, whose father worked on the QE2, began an online campaign to save the 963ft cruiser after reports that she was on the verge of being sold for scrap by her Dubai owners. More than 2000 people have pledged support on Facebook and 276 have signed a petition calling for the Scottish Government to intervene.
Mr Paterson said: "I fully support the campaign to have this wonderful vessel returned to its home town. It should be returned home for future generations to cherish and be proud of."
The MSPs who have added their names to the motion are Annabelle Ewing, Rob Gibson, Joan McAlpine, Roderick Campbell, Kenneth Gibson, Adam Ingram, Bill Walker, Willie Coffey, Sandra White, Chic Brodie and David Torrance.
Mr Sherry praised the support his campaign was generating. He said: "It is fantastic. That is what we are looking for. I would hope that we could get cross-party support for the campaign. Obviously if we have got any chance to get the QE2 back we need the support of the whole country."
A group has been set up to look at funding and make contact with Dubai. The next meeting will be on January 28 at the Hub Community Centre in Clydebank.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article