A MAN has told a murder trial that he arranged to meet a man later found murdered on the day he went missing.
But James Steele, 47, told the High Court in Glasgow that when he phoned to confirm the meeting with Martin Toner, he replied: "Something's come up."
Mr Steele, of Glasgow, told advocate depute Alex Prentice QC, prosecuting, that he was due to meet with Mr Toner at Di Maggio's in Shawlands at 4pm on June 29 2004.
The jury heard that Mr Steele phoned Mr Toner around 3pm and said: "Can I meet you it's Steelie."
Mr Toner then said: "Something's come up. I'm outside Glasgow, the now. "
He was giving evidence at the trial of Douglas Fleming, 50, and John McDonald, 57, of Bellahouston, Glasgow, who deny murdering Mr Toner on that date.
The pair are alleged to have killed Mr Toner at the garden and grounds of the Coach House at Gleddoch Estate, Langbank, and Gleddoch Estate on June 29, 2004 after inducing him to travel there from a gym in Glasgow.
When asked how Mr Toner sounded during the brief phone call which lasted less than a minute Mr Steele replied: "normal."
Mr Prentice asked Mr Steele, who is one of six incriminees named by murder accused Fleming: "Did you kill Mr Toner?" and he replied: "No, I did not." He also denied facilitating or organising his death.
Anthony Nelson, 42, another incriminee, also denied killing Mr Toner or having anything to do with his death. He told the court that he believed Mr Prentice that Mr Toner was due to stand trial over allegations of drug dealing.
However, he denied a suggestion from Mr Prentice that he would have run away, saying he would not have done it without his family.
Fleming has lodged a special defence of incrimination against six men. Both men also deny a further charge of attempting to defeat the ends of justice.
The trial before Lord Armstrong continues.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article