Newsnight boss Ian Katz has defended presenter Kirsty Wark dancing to Michael Jackson's Thriller and denied the show has been dumbed down.
Mr Katz took over the BBC's current affairs show last summer, after the programme got into hot water following its aborted investigation into Jimmy Savile and false accusations against Lord McAlpine.
Newsnight has since hit the headlines thanks to Jeremy Paxman's interviews with Russell Brand and former Co-op Bank chairman Paul Flowers and Emily Maitlis "interviewing" Cookie Monster.
But Mr Katz said : "Kirsty dancing to Thriller was one of those memorable moments, the kind of thing that makes the audience say, 'I must stay with this programme to see what happens'.
"Any suggestion of dumbing down is painfully preposterous. Newsnight is more serious than at any time in its recent past."
Paxman was criticised for being too soft when he interviewed Mr Flowers, who stepped down as the bank's chairman amid claims of illegal drug use and inappropriate expenses payments.
Mr Katz said: "One of Jeremy's strengths is he can do different types of interview - oppositional or emotionally intelligent. There is a discussion to be had about interviewing - heat versus light.
"It's often possible to get more interesting insights without going in with your arms swinging, but the audience does seem to crave the drama of the bout. You get damned either way."
Asked about the presenter's on-screen sneering, he said: "Most of that is hammy, part of his shtick, and people love him for that, just as they love him for asking the same question 15 times or raising his eyebrow with such scepticism it seems the interviewee will dissolve in the chair."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article