ONE of Scotland's largest health boards is planning legal action against the private firm that runs its flagship hospital after a patient in surgery had to be sewn up by torchlight.
NHS Lothian said it can no longer tolerate potentially deadly failures in the maintenance of Edinburgh Royal Infirmary after two operating theatres were plunged into darkness at the hospital.
Both theatres suffered a power cut when staff from private firm Consort, which runs the facility, started scheduled maintenance work too early and switched off the electricity supply.
Back-up systems were not available and theatre staff had to use torches to light one patient while a surgeon completed the operation. A second patient who was being prepared for surgery in another theatre had a procedure cancelled at the last minute.
It follows a similar incident in December when a father had to use the torch on his mobile phone to search for his newborn son in a birthing pool when the lights failed during the birth.
Alan Boyter, executive director at NHS Lothian, last night said the failures were unacceptable.
He said: "We have reached the point where we can no longer tolerate the repeated, serious and potentially life-threatening nature of these incidents at the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh by our PFI provider Consort.
"We are currently consulting with our lawyers to discuss what options we have in relation to the contract and it would be inappropriate to comment further while that is ongoing.
"Patient safety is always our absolute priority and we will not allow that to continually be put in danger by a third party."
Consort Healthcare won the Private Finance Initiative (PFI) contract to build and operate the Royal Infirmary in 1996.
It receives about £60 million a year for carrying out the hospital's non-medical services, such as maintenance, security, cleaning and catering.
NHS Lothian said Consort had "failed to follow critical procedures" by switching off the electricity before surgery finished in the latest incident.
It was earlier reported that the firm was to receive a £100,000 fine over the December incident and a further penalty and disciplinary procedures over the latest incident are expected.
The patient whose surgery was completed by torchlight has received an apology.
Margaret Watt, chairwoman of Scotland Patients Association, said: "Consort have put lives at risk too many times and we should not have to pay for them anymore.
"They have caused distress to patients and we should not have to put up with it. Patients will now worry about going to the hospital and it's not right."
Norman Provan, associate director at the Royal College of Nursing Scotland, said: "This incident is completely unacceptable and it comes at a time when NHS Lothian is already under a lot of pressure.
"It is totally understandable that the health board is going to take action against Consort given the seriousness of this situation. NHS Lothian now needs to reassure the public measures are being taken to ensure this type of error cannot happen ever again.
"Any maintenance work carried out by Consort at the Royal Infirmary must have no possible impact on patients by breaking power supplies or other services clearly critically important to safe patient care."
Consort director Stephen Gordon said the power had been disrupted for around 10 minutes.
He added: "Consort has taken this incident very seriously and has undertaken a thorough investigation in conjunction with NHS Lothian to review the current operating procedures in place for works of this nature."
Labour's health spokeswoman, Jackie Baillie, said: "It just defies belief. We need an independent inquiry to ensure this never happens again."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article