MOUNTAINEERS are calling on councillors to reject the proposal of a wind farm that would cover a large area in the Highlands.
Highland Council's south planning committee will meet tomorrow to consider Scottish and Southern Energy (SSE) proposals for the Stronelairg application for 83 turbines in the Monadhliath Mountains between the A9 and Loch Ness.
The Mountaineering Council of Scotland (MCofS) has previously opposed the wind farm, saying it would industrialise a large area of Highland landscape.
The charity, which represents hill walkers, climbers and mountaineers and has more than 11,000 members, is calling on councillors to reject the proposal and visit the area of the proposed site.
David Gibson, chief officer at MCofS, said: "This proposal by SSE would involve building a huge power plant with vast turbines, miles of trackways, buildings and huge masts, in some of the most beautiful mountains in Scotland, at the edge of the Cairngorms National Park.
"It is completely wrong-headed, putting energy company profits ahead of our national heritage.
"We are calling on councillors to either reject the proposal or, if they need further convincing, to pay a site visit and see first-hand what the scheme threatens to destroy.
"Highland councillors have already shown an impressive determination to oppose unsuitable developments, and we hope this will continue."
Objections have been lodged by a series of organisations, including the MCofS, the conservation charity John Muir Trust, the Cairngorms National Park Authority and Scottish Natural Heritage.
SSE say that comments regarding the impact are inaccurate. A spokesman said: "Rather than wilderness, the proposed wind farm is to be built around existing hydro-electric infrastructure and lies within a managed sporting estate containing over 20km of roads and tracks.
"It is also important to note that the entire development lies in Highland Council's own 'area of search' for wind energy development."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article