THE Vatican has refused to rule out the attendance of shamed Cardinal Keith O'Brien at a historic meeting of the world's leading Catholic clerics in Rome.
The Consistory, in October, will see cardinals from across the world gather in Rome to discuss the proposed canonisation of former Popes John Paul II and John XXIII, as well as advising Pope Francis on major papal appointments. It is expected to see the creation of around 10 cardinals.
Authorities on Catholic affairs said there was a potential for Cardinal O'Brien to attend. But the prospect of him attending such a high-profile event, just months after admitting decades of sexual behaviour with other clerics and being exiled by the Vatican, would be met with shock by Scotland's Catholics, according to one prominent members of the laiety.
When asked if the Cardinal would be attending the Consistory, the Vatican said yesterday it was in no position to confirm details of the meeting.
It is understood there has been no communication instructing him not to attend and according to one commentator a period of several months of "penitence" out of the public eye could see him sufficiently redeemed in the eyes of the church to take part.
Since being ordered to leave Scotland by the Vatican around two months ago, it is understood Cardinal O'Brien has been staying at an enclosed abbey in the English midlands.
Hugh McLoughlin, an expert in Vatican procedures, said: "In theory the chances of O'Brien being at the Consistory are pretty good. He might be told to stay away as he'd be a source of distraction.
"From the point of view of natural justice I don't see how they could deny him the opportunity to take part. He is by no means the only sinner in the College of Cardinals or the worst. So far he's obeyed what he's been told to do and clearly wants a future within the church. It is possible he could be there."
Former MSP and prominent Catholic Brian Fitzpatrick said: "The Catholics of Scotland would be shocked and I personally would be shocked if he turns up at the Consistory."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article