A £140 MILLION transformation of Aberdeen city centre has been abandoned, with Sir Ian Wood –the oil tycoon who pledged millions of his own money to the project – claiming councillors had shown "a lack of vision and confidence" after the plan was rejected by just two votes.

A watered-down counter-proposal was backed by 22 votes to 20, with one abstention, after a full-day's debate on the controversial scheme to raise Union Terrace Gardens from subterranean level and create a "world class" civic square.

It was claimed the regeneration could create 6500 new jobs and secure Aberdeen's status as a global player beyond the oil and gas era.

Aberdeen residents had voted 55% in favour of the plans in a referendum but a Labour pre-election promise to scrap the project led to further wrangling over Sir Ian's vision.

Last night, a restoration of the gardens and surrounding landmark buildings, including the art gallery, was agreed.

Sir Ian, chairman of global oil services firm The Wood Group, who offered £50m to the project, said: "Along with the majority of Aberdeen citizens who voted for the ambitious regeneration programme of our city centre, I am obviously very disappointed and dismayed by this outcome.

"I believe future generations, looking back on Aberdeen's oil era, will wonder why – after years of under-investment in our city centre, parts of which are clearly in decline – our city council failed to grasp the opportunity to do something really transformational and enhance their legacy.

"It's hard to believe that, following the positive referendum, our council have turned down an investment of £182m [including infrastructure costs] not available for other projects, with no impact on Aberdeen City Council's budget and with no impact on council tax payers.

"Labour councillor Willie Young earlier this week suggested 'big business is trying to call the shots and the ordinary citizens of Aberdeen are being sidelined'. That's exactly what the Labour Party and the council have done today – effectively sidelined the views of ordinary citizens of Aberdeen.

"We should be very concerned about the message this sends outside Aberdeen nationally and internationally about our lack of vision and confidence to invest for the future."

The Granite Web design was unveiled in January this year with 45,301 backing the scheme compared to 41,175 against in a 52% voter turnout.

Criticisms were made that the price to local businesses, which would pay back the outstanding costs through tax incremental financing, were too high.

Singer Annie Lennox, a key opponent of the project, claimed it was "an act of civic vandalism and an abandonment of democracy".

Mike Shepherd, chairman of the Friends of Union Terrace Gardens, said last night there was "no doubt that our councillors made the right decision" in turning down Sir Ian's project.

"The fatal flaw of the City Garden Project was that nothing was done to build consensus," added Mr Shepherd.

Richard Baker, Labour MSP for the North-East and Shadow Cabinet Secretary for Infrastructure and Capital Investment, said "common sense has prevailed".

He added: "The financial risks attached to the City Gardens Project were too great. We have plans which will be advanced by Aberdeen City Council which will take our city forward and are ambitious but realistic."

SNP council leader Calum McCaig, whose party supported the gardens development, said: "I don't think 'livid' would be a fair enough description of how I feel right now. It's the narrowest of defeats and its repercussions will be felt in Aberdeen for many years to come.

"It would have instilled the change required to weather potential future storms for when the oil and gas is no longer here."