Celtic and Rangers failed to meet an expert group set up by the Scottish Government to investigate sectarianism despite controversial legislation targeted largely at supporters of the Old Firm clubs.
In its report published yesterday, the group branded the sport's efforts to tackle the problem in football as "tokenistic and superficial."
The Advisory Group on Tackling Sectarianism was set up 16 months ago.
At the launch of its paper on religious bigotry in Scotland the group's head, Dr Duncan Morrow, said despite the absence of the clubs for that time, he still intended to meet them.
One source said: "Put it this way, there was some difficulty coordinating diaries between Celtic, Rangers and the group over nearly a year-and-a-half."
The Scottish Government will also carry out two national surveys on bigotry, one looking at public attitudes to sectarianism, and one to include in-depth qualitative research on community experiences of the problem in Scotland.
The advisory group, which met over 40 organisations, will now remain in place until March 2015.
The Herald revealed yesterday that the group had concluded sectarianism neither stemmed from nor was the responsibility of denominational schooling.
It said local government should get to grips with community rights around parades, and Scotland needed no new laws to deal with the problem.
However, it has body-swerved the issue of the controversial Offence Behaviour at Football Act, citing an expected review of the legislation.
The report said Scottish sectarianism was not merely religious but something which "can involve a negative mixing of religion with politics, sporting allegiance and national identifications … arising from a distorted view of identity and belonging".
Sectarianism, the authors add, does not have to be "explicitly contemptuous, aggressive or offensive, can be polite and educated and may populate boardrooms, trustee committees, professional bodies, schools and government".
Ingredients often include anti-Irish and anti-British hostility related to Irish politics, historic elements of anti-Catholicism, class and political affiliation, and commercial interests.
Concern was also expressed at the "apparent reluctance of many senior and influential people across Scottish society to show the kind of leadership required to tackle sectarianism".
The report calls for "leadership to challenge the environment of friendly indulgence or passive acceptance of sectarian 'banter'".
On football it states: "It is impossible to ignore the fact that sectarianism continues to exist at many levels in Scottish football.
"We need to go beyond tokenistic and superficial gestures to deeply embed an anti-sectarian ethos into, and across, every area."
Dr Morrow said: "Sectarianism is real in many communities and this is a long game. It has withered in some places, and remains intact or has mutated in others.
"It is a subtle issue which we hope will become something talked about in the history classes of the future. There is good news in this. It doesn't appear to be the burning issue for the whole of Scotland that it may have been once.
"And just about everyone said it wasn't a positive in Scottish life."
Announcing the two new national surveys, community safety minister Roseanna Cunningham said: "We have got historic studies on sectarianism but nothing underpinning the current scenario.
"We don't want policy based on anecdote. Perception and experience isn't always the same."
A Celtic spokeswoman said: "The continual inference that football in some way is responsible for sectarianism does not understand or reflect the wider issue.
"Sectarianism is a symptom of social failings and is therefore a matter for society as a whole."
A Rangers spokeswoman said: "We have also indicated to the advisory group that we are happy to offer them any assistance ."
She added: "Rangers and other … clubs have shown leadership on the subject and our initiatives have been effective and ground-breaking."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article