A SCOTTISH Olympian was banned from training at one of the country's biggest stadiums – in case she slipped while crossing a running track.
Runner Lynsey Sharp asked to run on the grass in the centre of Meadowbank Stadium, Edinburgh, but was refused on health and safety grounds.
A council official told the elite athlete she was not allowed to walk across the 10-metre wide running track to reach the middle in case she slipped on ice.
And officials also claimed the grass could not be used for running because football had been played on it.
Sharp, 22, said: "Every other track in Scotland will be open despite the cold weather but I can't use one 10 minutes from my house.
"It's a constant battle, it just seems like there's always something."
The athlete, who won a silver medal at the 2012 European Championships in Helsinki and reached the semi-finals of the 800m at London 2012, said she regularly has to fight for a training slot at Meadowbank. She added: "One Sunday a month you can't get on the track because of an antiques fair – they also have other fairs that mean you can't use it, or it's closed for football or for the fireworks.
"It's the only track of its kind in Edinburgh and this is what we have to contend with? It seems like they are more interested in making money with these outdoor events than they are in supporting athletes."
Edinburgh City Council claim the track was "rendered unusable" by the cold, despite being gritted.
A £25 million plan to rebuild a stadium elsewhere recently fell through after a dispute about the value of the land. Edinburgh Council has since spent £1.4m on repair work until a permanent solution can be found.
The council's culture and leisure vice-convenor Austin Hart said he understood Sharp's frustration.
He said: "We're really sympathetic to her very specialised training needs, and I think Meadowbank also has a hard job in trying to balance all the different demands on it."
A spokesman for Edinburgh Leisure said: "The grass in the middle of the track has been used as a football pitch and this made it an unsafe surface for running."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article