Orkney has scraped on to a "top 50" list of most desirable places to live in the UK.
Hart in Hampshire was crowned the best location for the third year in a row.
The annual Halifax quality of life survey looks at a wide range of factors such as health and life expectancy, crime rates, weather, employment and the performance of local schools.
Nowhere in Wales or Northern Ireland made the "top 50" list, but Scotland scraped in with the Orkney Islands placed at number 50. Just one area of London was included, with the City of London in 38th position.
Nestled in the north-east corner of Hampshire, residents of Hart were found to be the healthiest in the UK, with 97.4% of residents reported to be in good or fairly good health.
They also live the longest in the UK, with an average male life expectancy of 82.9 years compared with the national average of 79 years. The 80% employment rate in Hart is also significantly above the national average of 71%, while typical weekly earnings in Hart at £843 are more than one-third higher than the national average of £616.
The district of Hart, which is centred on the town of Fleet, has been dubbed "a step back in time", with 84 square miles of green wooded landscape and Hampshire's largest freshwater lake.
But Hart residents face paying a high premium to live there. The average house price in Hart is seven times the annual local wage - much higher than the UK average multiple of 5.8 times.
Uttlesford in Essex, which came in second place, also has an average house price-to-earnings ratio of seven. Uttlesford, which was placed at number six a year ago, performed particularly well with its 84% employment rate and weekly average earnings of £819.
This year saw several big climbers into the top 10 list of districts with the best quality of life.
South Northamptonshire soared up 27 places to the third spot, Rushcliffe in Nottingham shot up from number 22 last year to seven and Winchester, which was placed at number 34 in 2012, is now in ninth place.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article