A Scot and her friend who have pleaded guilty to attempting to smuggle £1.5million worth of cocaine are facing a renewed threat of lengthy jail terms.
It comes after prosecutors in Peru's capital Lima rejected the pleas entered by Melissa Reid, of Lenzie, East Dunbartonshire, and Michaella McCollum, of Dungannon, Co Tyrone.
The pair, both 20, had admitted to attempting to smuggle 24lb of the drug in packets on a flight to Spain from Lima on Tuesday.
They had been told to expect jail sentences of six years and eight months in prison without parole.
However, in a surprise move this has now been thrown out.
Prosecutor Juan Rosas said that he will ask for a new hearing to give McCollum and Reid of Glasgow the chance to offer a more complete confession.
If this is not forthcoming, there is the possibility they will face a trial and, if found guilty, are likely to receive far lengthier terms in prison in Peru.
Mr Rosas said they need to explain why they initially claimed they were coerced by a gang of armed men.
He disputed a statement issued by the court where the women entered their plea that said they had provided information on their co-conspirators.
"The prosecution thinks the charges have not yet been completely embraced. They have simply accepted transporting drugs, but what has not yet been examined is their original version - that they were kidnapped or were transporting the drugs against their will," Mr Rosas said.
"As far as the prosecution is concerned, these citizens were never kidnapped, were never threatened or coerced.
"If they stick to that unbelievable story the prosecution is not going to allow them the benefit of a guilty plea."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article