A council planning committee is facing a 2000ft trek up a mountain into snow drifts to visit the proposed site of a controversial wind farm.
The visit to the Monadhliath Mountains between the A9 and Loch Ness is necessary to examine SSE's plans for the 83 turbine Stronelairg wind farm.
Ministers will make a final decision, but if the council does object it will trigger a public inquiry
The plans have already been scaled down from 144 turbines, but now the committee is being advised not to object as long as the number of turbines, each 443ft high, is further reduced by 16 to 67.
The council has received 138 letters of objection, including from the Mountaineering Council of Scotland and the wild land charity the John Muir Trust, and only four in support.
Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH) has objected because of the adverse impact the development would have on wild land and the wider landscape.
A spokesman for SNH said it would maintain its objection even if the number of turbines was reduced to 67.
Now councillors have decided by a narrow margin that they had to see the site for themselves to appreciate its true wildness.
This was against the advice of their planning officials who said much of the site could only be viewed from the tops of Munro (above 3000ft) and Corbett (2500-3000ft) mountains.
But Inverness councillor, independent nationalist Donnie Kerr moved that the committee should make the effort: He said: "The argument is about wild land, and that can not be taken from a photograph. It is something you feel and sense.
"Accessibility is not the factor is used to be. We can get our hiking boots on, or a friend of mine has a dog sled team.
"I could make inquiries."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article