DAVID Cameron has appealed to former Guantanamo Bay detainee Moazzam Begg to share any information he has about the Islamic State militants behind the capture of Western hostages.
Mr Begg, who is from Birmingham, has claimed he offered to help the Government secure the release of British hostage Alan Henning from Islamic State (IS) extremists but was prevented from issuing a direct appeal.
He also said he believed he knew those who held the murdered aid worker and had helped secure the release of hostages from extremists in Syria in the past.
The Prime Minister told BBC's North West Tonight: "We are very happy to work with anybody.
"These people in Syria are absolutely brutal and will stoop to any depths, and that is what's happened. But if Moazzam Begg has information about who these people are, he should provide it."
The Prime Minister defended the way the Government had handled the IS hostage situation following criticism from Mr Henning's family that they had been prevented from speaking out about his capture.
He said: "I think it's a really difficult issue and I don't think there are any easy answers. What we try and do is work very closely with the family, and I have obviously spoken to the family on a couple of occasions to hear their views.
"The approach we take is to work with the family, to try and find the hostages, but not to raise the media profile of an individual case because it can put that person at even greater risk."
Mr Henning's brother Reg urged Mr Begg to make efforts to save the lives of other hostages held by IS.
Reg Henning told the BBC: "If possible I would have liked anyone to have saved Alan's life, regardless of their history or background.
"If Moazzam Begg believes he could have saved my brother's life I would ask him to make the same efforts to save the lives of all hostages in Syria."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article