SCOTTISH Tories have questioned police priorities after The Herald revealed inflation-busting pay rises for the country's six assistant chief constables.
As reported yesterday, they will collect £115,000 a year, up from annual salaries of between £91,000 and £107,000, but will lose their bonuses.
Government and police sources insist the rise is designed to reflect the growing duties of the six men and women under the new single national force, which came in to being last April.
However, John Lamont, the Scottish Conservatives' chief whip, said: "One of the main reasons for creating a single force was to save money.
"To that end, we have seen the closure and reduction of hours in front desks, something we criticised heavily.
"So quite where these significant pay increases for senior staff fit into the efficiencies agenda I am not sure.
"People will be right to question whether or not Police Scotland has its priorities right."
Scottish Labour's justice spokesman, Graeme Pearson also believes the rises are "insensitive".
Brian Docherty, chairman of the Scottish Police Federation, which represents rank-and-file officers, said the rise had caused "a bit of angst" given the force was going through a painful process of voluntary redundancies.
Meanwhile, the Scottish Government said its overall bill for senior officers had fallen since the new force began after what amounted to a cull of chief officers at the former forces around Scotland and agencies.
A spokeswoman said: "This has now reduced the total costs of the senior officer team by half to £2 million. "
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article