Police officers will have less computer support to fight crime than a washing machine repairman, it has been claimed.
The Scottish Police Authority (SPA), the civilian oversight body for the new single police force, said ministers had "underestimated" the cost of integrating the computer systems of the old eight forces.
They have been given a £12 million integration budget for the next three years, almost the same as the information and com- munications technology (ICT) budget of an organisation one-tenth of Police Scotland's size, Holyrood's Justice Sub-Committee on Policing heard.
The SPA may have to sell off police buildings to make up the shortfall, its chairman Vic Emery told the committee.
Labour MSP Graeme Pearson said: "It seems to me the guy that comes and fits my washing machine has better IT support for his product delivery than we have for a police officer."
Mr Emery said: "I don't disagree with any of that.
"We need to work, and we are working, closely with the police so they can deliver their obligations to us, and so we can deliver them to you and the public."
Conservative MSP Margaret Mitchell asked if the £12m integration budget was "realistic or reasonably accurate".
SPA interim chief executive Andrea Quinn said: "I have previously said it was underestimated, and once the blueprint and strategy has been agreed I think it will show it has been underestimated.
"What should the number be? I don't know but that's what the strategy will tell us.
"In our professional view, when you look at an external company and its turnover and what it would invest in ICT it's a lot more than £12m over three years."
SPA chief information officer Martin Leven said the old Scottish Police Services Authority, which had an annual budget of around £105m, spent £3.5m a year on ICT.
Police Scotland, with an annual budget of £1.2 billion, has been given almost the same amount on average to integrate the ICT systems of eight forces.
He said: "We are talking, I would say, more than £12m over a three-year period to significantly invest in the IT infrastructure."
Mr Emery said: "We're not in the middle but we are part way down the journey of understanding where all our finances are and what we can do with them.
"For example, we have inherited a huge estate of property, and we don't need all of that estate.
"If we dispose of some of that estate we could use some of that money to put back into systems that will actually give us more benefits.
"But we can't answer those questions until we understand the end-to-end situation.
"It's fair to say that if you took it in isolation, £12m over three years won't give you the ICT systems you want, but there are avenues of making savings that could supplement that to make it much more viable."
Ms Mitchell laid out the litany of costly public-sector ICT failures over the years, including about £133m of cancellations and delays at the Crown Office, Disclosure Scotland and Registers of Scotland.
Mr Pearson, a former policeman, said: "I hope we will begin to see some flesh on the bones that will give an assurance, not to me because I'm lucky enough that I don't need to go out at 11pm to do streetwork any more, but to the 20,000-odd who are out there doing it for us."
Mr Leven offered some "comfort" to the committee by stressing they had already delivered large ICT projects, including a national management information system, on time ahead of Police Scotland's inception on April 1.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article