A FORMER Scots Guard has told of his relief after Portuguese authorities dropped a request to extradite him for a crime he was acquitted of 17 years ago.
Graham Mitchell, 49, originally from Paisley, said he had been through hell waiting to hear if he would have to stand trial again for the attempted murder of a German tourist in the Algarve in 1994.
He had been contesting his extradition in the UK courts, but campaigners yesterday revealed Portuguese officials had removed the request due to the length of time passed.
The married father-of-two, now of Canterbury, said he is delighted the request has finally been dropped.
He said: "I am thrilled that the criminal charges against me are now extinct. My family and I have been through hell.
"I'd like to thank my legal team, family, friends and colleagues – the support I have received has made the whole episode slightly more bearable."
Mr Mitchell and his friend, Warren Tozer, were originally arrested over an alleged assault on Andre Jorling, who was left paralysed after falling off a sea wall.
After spending more than a year in prison, the pair were cleared in a high-profile trial in 1995.
However, Portugal's Supreme Court revoked the decision and ordered a retrial.
A European arrest warrant was issued in 2008, but it was not until March this year that Mr Mitchell – a photographer who lives with his wife Laura and two children – was re-arrested by British police.
Jago Russell, chief executive of Fair Trials International, warned that reforms are need in the extradition process.
He said: "It would have been a grave injustice if the EU's fast-track extradition system had been used to subject Graham to another trial in Portugal, so many years after he was acquitted.
"Prosecutors should think twice before issuing these tick-box extradition requests and reforms must be made now to stop future cases of injustice."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article