PENSION savers will see thousands of pounds shaved off their predicted future retirement pots from 2014 under the City regulator's plans to give them a more realistic idea of potential returns.
The Financial Services Authority (FSA) said it would reduce the standard projection rates used to show possible future returns and the impact of charges for someone taking out a product such as a personal pension or a life policy.
It said the move would reduce the possibility of consumers being given a false impression of the size of their potential cash pots.
Firms will have a year to implement the new projection rates, which come into force in April 2014.
Under the current system, firms are required to use projection rates to show what returns an investor might receive, which are not a firm guarantee but give a flavour of what people might gain from their investment.
They are meant to give three different rates of return and revise them down if a product is unlikely to achieve this.
The FSA has been consulting on plans to strengthen the rules after finding providers often fail to comply with the requirement.
Under the current system, a pension statement shows what a pension will be worth if it grows by 5%, 7% and 9%. But the FSA said the projection rates would be cut to 2%, 5% and 8% to make sure customers are not given potentially exaggerated information.
The changes could lead to people reconsidering their plans for retirement. At present, a 22-year-old earning £30,000 a year who contributes just under £2000 annually to their pension is told their projected pension income would be about £10,300 on retirement at 68, based on a mid-point growth rate of 7%.
But under the new mid-point growth rate of 5%, the projected income would be about £6400, according to research from financial services provider Hargreaves Lansdown.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article