PRINCE Charles tried to intervene in a Highland planning row on behalf of pensioners who blame their local council for blocking their view of Ben Nevis.
It has emerged the heir to the throne recently became involved in the row over Highland Council's handling of the new £7 million Gaelic Primary School for Fort William. It is being built in the community of Caol and the 40ft high sports hall has proved highly controversial.
Tavish Cameron and his wife Betty, both 86, are among a group of pensioners who have lost their view of Scotland's highest mountain. But before Ben Nevis was completely obscured, they sought help from Prince Charles, and he responded.
In a letter in August marked private and confidential, the Prince's private secretary said: "I am afraid to say that, generally speaking, planning issues of this kind are not areas in which his Royal Highness can become involved. However, I will make enquires of Highland Council and will write back." But the following month the Prince wrote: "I have been in touch with Highland Council, and have received assurances that the matters you and others have raised in relation to the new Gaelic Primary in Caol, have now been fully investigated and responded to.
"I understand that Caol Community Council has been invited to be involved in the Liaison Group and I can only hope that you and others in the local community are feeling more confident about the project."
But Mr Cameron said: "We finally lost the view around September. We are still in negotiations, but our best hope is that we can get some glazing at the higher level of the building. We wouldn't get our view back, but we should get some light through it."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article