YOUNG people who travel to Syria and other countries to join Isis or take part in a jihad should be treated as victims, according to an abuse charity.
Ali Khan, chair of ethnic minority child abuse charity Roshni, said any British young people who left the country in such circumstances, and later chose to return should not be criminalised.
Instead, they should be allowed to share their experiences with other teenagers and young adults, he said.
Meanwhile, writing in The Herald today, Mr Khan says radicalisation should be viewed as a child protection issue, on a par with child sexual abuse.
"We can examine the broader themes of cause, prevention and intervention. However we also need to consider the common threads of the two issues - grooming, vulnerability and isolation," he said.
The comments come as Roshni, which focuses on issues affecting the wellbeing of ethnic minority women and children, is set to hold a major debate next month which will bring young people together to discuss issues of child sexual exploitation and radicalisation.
The first event of its kind, Exploiting, Exploited at Glasgow City Chambers on May 20 aims to identify the root causes of radicalisation and child sexual exploitation, by asking minority ethnic teenagers to discuss their experiences with policy makers, professionals and politicians.
Mr Khan said that radicalisation, grooming and child sexual exploitation are high profile issues in the media and politics, but young people were often too scared to speak out.
This is partly because of sensitivities around race and religion, he said. Rightly or wrongly, Muslims and Islam were often seen as the main offenders in both the child sexual exploitation agenda and issues around radicalisation, Mr Khan added.
This raises difficult issues for some ethnic minority groups, because while victims of child abuse are seen as victims and those who groomed them as criminals, the same does not apply to those groomed into extremism, who instead face judgement, travel bans and criminalisation.
Young people are aware of the stereotypes and want to challenge them, Mr Khan said, but fear speaking up could leave them subject to investigation by the authorities.
Exploiting Exploited will provide a platform for young people to air their views in a safe environment, he said.
Meanwhile he called for a rethink about attitudes to young people such as 'Glasgow jihadist' Aqsa Mahmood, who left Scotland for Syria in 2013 at the age of 19, or the Bethnal Green teenagers who are thought to have travelled there via Turkey in December 2014.
"Due to their vulnerability they have left the country and are subsequently seen as criminals. They are not labelled a victim. Instead they are seen as a radical, jihadi or even an extremist," he said. "A different option would be to support young people who make mistakes and use them as ambassadors to educate other young people, he said. "With evidence demonstrating that a peer-led support programme will help other young people learn, should we let young people return and truly talk about the reality?" he added.
Mr Khan said next month's event would allow ethnic minority young people to contribute to this conversation, by explaining their own experiences of two highly sensitive issues, and helping to find effective solutions.
"We will be facilitating constructive, meaningful dialogue between policy makers and minority ethnic young people, many of whom have never before been part of the solution," he said.
Last month London mayor Boris Johnson also likened radicalisation to child abuse and argued children who were were being exposed to extremism should be taken into care. However the Muslim Council of Great Britain condemned his comments as inflammatory.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article