ROYAL Bank of Scotland chairman, Sir Philip Hampton, has put more pressure on Alex Salmond by hammering home the institution's need for clarity on what independence would mean for its future plans.
Sir Philip said in a speech the part-state owned bank would "try to achieve clarity for what independence might mean". Finance Secretary John Swinney and Scottish Labour leader Johann Lamont were among the guests at the function in Edinburgh.
It came as the First Minister faced further problems over his claims Scotland's would automatically remain in the EU if it split from the rest of the UK.
EC Vice-President Viviane Reding has backed Spanish claims suggesting a newly independent country would have to apply for membership.
Sir Philip's comments chime with those of other senior business leaders who have called for more detail on what independence would involve.
In the context of the current debate, Sir Philip underlined the importance of the location of headquarters to financial markets' perception of banks.
While Sir Philip said he would "hope and expect" RBS would "be able to remain" a flagship, Scottish-headquartered business, he said: "From a business point of view, domicile is always important to banks and to the market perception of banks."
However, Sir Philip did emphasise RBS's "complete political neutrality" in the debate. He said: "There is no position that would be appropriate to us."
Highlighting RBS's status as Scotland's largest private sector employer, Sir Philip said: "Nearly all of our board meetings take place here. The bank is very proud of our historic links with Scotland.
"We are important to Scotland. Scotland is very important to us, both for the history and the future."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article