Allegations that small businesses were driven to collapse by the Royal Bank of Scotland are "deeply troubling" and ought to be pursued "to the fullest extent of the law", Bank of England governor Mark Carney has said.
Mr Carney said the Financial Conduct Authority had been informed but agreed that it was "shocking" that the allegations had not been picked up earlier.
A report by Business Secretary Vince Cable's adviser Lawrence Tomlinson alleges RBS drove firms to collapse in order to buy back their assets at low prices.
Mr Carney told MPs on the Treasury Select Committee that the claims were "deeply troubling and extremely serious", adding:"This has to be tracked down to the fullest extent of the law."
Mr Carney also mounted a robust defence of forward guidance - accusing its critics of a "failure of logic" - and said he was offended by suggestions that he was too close to Chancellor George Osborne.
During the wide-ranging hearing, he also defended his views on the importance of the financial sector to the UK, and acknowledged doubts about the quality of economic data provided by the Office for National Statistics (ONS).
He said increasing the number of women running the Bank of England would be a central priority.
On RBS, Mr Carney dismissed the idea that "predatory restructuring" of businesses could be a consequence of rules obliging banks to increase the ratio of capital they hold, saying: "This behaviour is a fundamental violation of the banking relationship."
He said the FCA was taking the matter "extremely seriously".
Pressed on whether such practices should have been picked up earlier by regulators or within RBS, he said: "If these activities proceeded on any sort of scale, I think it is remarkable. It is shocking."
Mr Carney shrugged off the comparison with Lord King, but insisted: "I don't believe that the success of the financial sector is to the detriment of other sectors of the economy."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article