FEW in Scotland's more remote and inaccessible communities have faith in government commitments that the Universal Service Obligation (USO) will survive, and know they will be the first to suffer it if goes.
This is true on the Knoydart Peninsula, where the 110-strong community depend on a ferry to and from Mallaig for their postal deliveries, and all other supplies.
Angela Williams, Development Manager for Knoydart Foundation which owns 17,000 acres of the old estate following the community buyout in 1999, said there was genuine concern.
"We get our post delivered at the same price as the centre of London but how long will that continue? We already suffer from pricing for courier deliveries which can be prohibitive. Just yesterday we were trying to order something at home which was supposed to be free delivery but as soon we gave our postcode we were told free delivery would cost something like £11 so we fear for the future."
David Cameron, chairman of Community Land Scotland, which represents the Foundation and community landowners across the Highlands and Islands including South Uist, Eigg and Assynt, is also concerned.
"I believe all political parties in Westminster and Holyrood should give an absolute commitment that they will not reduce the service."
Western Isles Council Leader Angus Campbell said: "The issue of privatisation of the Royal Mail is a very real threat to the islands' postal service and the principle of a USO. Together with colleagues in Shetland and Orkney we will be making representations to the Government on this issue."
Highland Council Leader Drew Hendry said: "Once you allow private forces in to something that belongs in the public sector, you are controlled by shareholders who are looking for a return which doesn't sit easily with the USO."
Caithness, Sutherland and Ross SNP MSP Rob Gibson also queried how a privatised royal Mail will benefit users.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article