Amassive £172 million will be required to modernise Scotland's historic buildings, according to a secret report by the Government's heritage agency.
Historic Scotland has identified 1700 "urgent" conservation issues and predicts that any repairs involving scaffolding may not be affordable. The shock findings have been kept from MSPs, with a source at the agency adding that many of the cultural attractions are in a "shocking and dangerous state".
Historic Scotland cares for 345 properties north of the Border, including Edinburgh and Stirling castles. Its estate, which also has abbeys, monuments and museums, is a vital part of Scotland's tourism appeal. Ministers have backed controversial plans to merge the agency with another body, the Royal Commission on the Ancient and Historical Monuments of Scotland.
But the Sunday Herald can reveal that the new organisation that is expected to replace both heritage bodies will inherit a multi-million pound investment backlog.
Two senior Historic Scotland staff - director of conservation David Mitchell, and commercial and tourism director Stephen Duncan - completed an internal report on the state of the sector in February.
The conclusions, which have been obtained by this newspaper, predict that £42m will be required over the next 20 years to conserve buildings. Another £63m will be needed for new infrastructure and facilities relating to the estate, as well as £67m for visitor presentation and tourism, bringing the total to £172.7m.
This figure is "over and above" currently allocated budgets.
The directors flagged up 7500 "medium" and 1700 "urgent" conservation issues. The report warned: "Lack of project funding means that it is increasingly likely they will be generally limited to ground-level works (ie those not requiring scaffolding)."
The directors noted that investment on "basic underlying infrastructure" was"inadequate".
If resources do not become available, the authors argue, it could mean a "loss of historic fabric and leave Historic Scotland exposed to accusations of having different standards for its own properties compared to the other 7700 Ancient Monuments" in Scotland which are not cared for by Historic Scotland.
The directors warned that Edinburgh and Stirling castles have "management issues".
The report, commissioned by the Scottish Government, was completed against a backdrop of funding cuts to Historic Scotland.
Scottish Tory culture spokeswoman Liz Smith said she would write to Culture Secretary Fiona Hyslop "as a matter of urgency".
A spokesperson for Historic Scotland said: "The Government recognises the scale of the challenge across the agency's sites and commissioned this report to get a fuller understanding of the key priorities. This work is ongoing."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article