A "fundamental review" of the policy on using television cameras in court is to be carried out, Scotland's top judge has announced.
Lord Gill, Lord President of Scotland's judiciary, said that technology has changed considerably in the 20 years since broadcasters have been able to apply for permission to televise proceedings, and that a review is required.
He has instructed judicial office holders to carry out a review and no further applications to film in court will be considered until it is completed.
The Judicial Office for Scotland currently receives between three and four requests to film in court each year.
A statement on the Judiciary of Scotland website said: "The Lord President, the Rt Hon Lord Gill, has decided to conduct a fundamental review of the current policy on the use of television cameras in court.
"The Lord President has determined that the current policy requires to be revisited and given extended consideration.
"He has instructed that a review be undertaken by Judicial Office Holders. Until this review is completed no further applications to film in court will be considered by the Judicial Office for Scotland."
In April, David Gilroy became the first convicted killer to have his sentence filmed for British TV.
Judge Lord Bracadale was recorded as he handed Gilroy a mandatory life sentence for murdering his colleague, Suzanne Pilley, whose body has never been found.
The television camera focused solely on the judge.
It was the first time a UK High Court sentencing was filmed for an on-the-day TV broadcast.
Windfall Films, on behalf of Channel 4, has been granted permission to film a number of High Court trials.
The statement said this project will be allowed to continue until it is complete.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article