AN inquiry into the case of a man pronounced dead, only for signs of life to be detected in a mortuary, has found he had not still been alive.
Julian Bell, 44, from Easter Ross, was recovered from the water after falling from the Kessock Bridge beside Inverness.
He had been in the water for 10 minutes. The lifeboat crew tried to resuscitate him and were joined by ambulance personnel. He was pronounced dead at the scene and his body taken to Raigmore Hospital in the Highland capital.
In the mortuary, a member of the pathology staff and an undertaker believed they saw evidence to suggest he was still alive. They thought pulses could be detected in the neck and wrists and believed they had seen movement of the chest. Hospital staff tried again to resuscitate him without success.
A report by NHS Highland into the episode in June, published yesterday, said: "The deceased had suffered significant internal injuries to his lungs and liver at the time of impact with the water. These were not compatible with life.
"It was believed the deceased's heart had stopped functioning at around the time of these injuries."
It said it was possible that there was still some electrical activity within the heart "but this in itself did not indicate that the heart was pumping blood and therefore able to support life".
It suggested that resuscitation attempts may have resulted in air being pumped into the stomach, which could have moved or leaked later resulting in chest movement. The review group concluded that it was "most unlikely" that true signs of life were seen at the mortuary and it was appropriate he had been pronounced dead.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article